Legal Opinion

Gedney v. Snake River Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1940No. 6685PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

February 2, 1910, Snake River Irrigation Company, Ltd., hereinafter called the construction company, entered into a contract with the state of Idaho to build an irrigation system for the reclamation of a tract of land pursuant to an act of congress approved August 18,1894, commonly known as the “Carey Act,” and amendments thereto, and pursuant to applicable laws of Idaho and rules and regulations of the state board of land commissioners. In accordance with the contract Snake River Canal Company was formed for the purpose of operating and managing the irrigation system by means of which the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Colburn v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hale v. McCammon Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Bradshaw v. Milner Low Lift Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Little v. Nampa-Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Nelson v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Hale v. McCammon Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API