Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Adair

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 3, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Assumpsit, by a guest, for loss of goods. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Henry V. Freeman, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

deliveeed the opinion of the Coubt.

The appellee is by occupation a concert singer.

The appellant is the proprietor of Hotel Carlyle, 228 to 230 North Clark street, Chicago. From August 28 to September 6, 1894, she taught piano lessons to the wife of the manager—not the proprietor—of the hotel, and during that period lodged and ate in the hotel, then went south for five weeks. She returned and lodged, not ate, in the hotel, from October 10th to October 30th, and then went again. December 24th returned again, and lodged only in the house until April 1, 1895.

On the night…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hancock v. . RandNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kieffer v. KeoughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Moon v. YarianAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  3. Blake v. De Jonghe Hotel & Restaurant Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. Burdock v. Chicago Hotel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API