Legal Opinion

Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Smith

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1874PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gaby, Judge, presiding. This was an action brought by Chester M. Smith, appellee, against the Pullman Palace Car Company, appellant, for the recovery of §1180, claimed to have been lost from the Pullman sleeping car Missouri, on the night of December 17, 1872, under the following circumstances: On the afternoon of Dec. 17, 1872, appellee started from his home in Oconomowoc, Wis., for a point in Missouri…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gaby, Judge, presiding. This was an action brought by Chester M. Smith, appellee, against the Pullman Palace Car Company, appellant, for the recovery of §1180, claimed to have been lost from the Pullman sleeping car Missouri, on the night of December 17, 1872, under the following circumstances: On the afternoon of Dec. 17, 1872, appellee started from his home in Oconomowoc, Wis., for a point in Missouri southwest of St. Louis, for the purpose of buying horses and mules. He purchased a ticket through to St. Louis, via the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheldon

The instruction which the court gave to the jury made the company responsible as insurer for the safety of the money, imposing upon it the severe liability of an innkeeper or common carrier. And it is the position which appellee’s counsel take, that the relation between the parties in this case was that of innkeeper and guest, and that the liability of the company is that of an innkeeper.

In order to ascertain whether the exti-aordinary responsibility claimed, here exists, it becomes important to inquire into the nature of inns and guests, where this liability was imposed by the common law,…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bailey v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Adams v. . New Jersey Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Woodruff Sleeping & Parlor Coach Co. v. DiehlIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Whicher v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API