Legal Opinion
People v. Dyson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant argues for the first time on appeal that suppression of his statement to the police is required because it was obtained in violation of his right to counsel. He argues that there was a three-week delay between the decision to arrest defendant and the date of his warrant-less arrest and that "the only conceivable reason” for the decision not to obtain an arrest warrant was to deprive defendant of his right to counsel, thereby enabling the police to obtain a statement from him in the absence of counsel. "The constitutional right to counsel…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. BanksNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. DunhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. MacisaacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- People v. WheelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996