Legal Opinion
People v. Dunham
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 7, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [2]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the verdict is not supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19). In any event, the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), “could lead a rational trier of fact to conclude that the elements of the crime have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt”…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. PellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Black v. GoordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006