Legal Opinion

Georgia v. Randolph

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 22, 2006No. 04-1067Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

547 U.S. 103 (2006)

GEORGIA

v.

RANDOLPH

No. 04-1067.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 8, 2005.

Decided March 22, 2006.

Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General of Georgia, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, and Mary Beth Westmoreland, Deputy Attorney General.

Deputy Solicitor General Dreeben argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Clement, Acting Assistant Attorney General Richter, Sri Srinivasan, and Deborah Watson.

Thomas C. Goldstein…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Souter; Concurrence · Stevens; Concurrence · Breyer; Dissent · Roberts; Dissent · Scalia; Dissent · Thomas.

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API