United States v. Hudson
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DeCICCO, Judge:
Following mixed pleas, appellant was convicted by a special court-martial, military judge alone, of four specifications of orally communicating indecent language over the telephone to various women in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934. He was acquitted of three other similar specifications. His sentence included a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 90 days, restriction for 30 days, and hard labor without confinement for 30 days. The convening authority approved the sentence. Appellant has assigned three errors for our…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. Gordon R. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. CaverNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
- United States v. PateArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000