Legal Opinion

Bennefield v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided July 22, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00309Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE RICKY JAMES BENNEFIELD, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Nos. 3:21-CV-309 ) 3:17-CR-079 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is Ricky James Bennefield’s (“Petitioner’s”) pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. [Doc. 1; Criminal Docket (“Crim.”) Doc. 76].1 The United States has responded in opposition. [Doc. 4]. Petitioner did not file a reply, and the time for doing so has passed. See Rule 5(d) of the Rules Governing Section 2255…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API