Legal Opinion

Woodruff Motors, Inc. v. Commercial Credit Corp.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 9, 1963No. 1218PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHulburd, C. J.

In its amended declaration, the plaintiff alleged that it sold a certain automobile to a buyer by the name of Blanchard. This was done under a conditional sale contract which the plaintiff assigned .to the defendant “with recourse.”- The conditional sale contract contained the following provision:

“Purchaser agrees to obtain and keep in force fire, theft and collision insurance on Car and other insurance requested by Seller. Such insurance shall be in form, amount and written by insurers satisfactory to Seller. Seller, as a creditor of Purchaser, is authorized to purchase any and all such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smyth v. Twin State Improvement Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  2. Barrett v. ShanksIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Central State Bank v. FordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Agosta v. Granite City Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  5. National Discount Corp. v. HasperMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  2. Commerce Union Bank v. MayTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Friendly Ford, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Evans v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. United States v. FylesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API