Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
BACKGROUND
BRAZIL, United States Magistrate Judge.
We address here defendant C.R. Bard’s motion to compel (1) disclosure of communications between inventors and their patent counsel made in anticipation of filing the application of the patent in issue and (2) testimony by inventors and their patent counsel setting forth directly their understanding of several key technical phrases used in the patent claims.
The principal purpose of defendant’s motion is to compel both the inventors and their patent counsel to disclose communications that preceded…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Natta v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McCook Metals L.L.C. v. Alcoa Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Ropes & Gray LLP v. JalbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Universal City Development Partners, Ltd. v. Ride & Show Engineering, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Exxon Research & Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.