Legal Opinion

Brown v. Floding

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 17, 1931No. 8155PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.

Under the pleadings and the evidence in this case, the court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition. While the contract as originally entered into might not have been enforceable, on the ground that it was without consideration and unilateral, the part performance of the contract and the services rendered in the business by tlie petitioner, as set forth and alleged in his petition, supplied the lack of mutuality and rendered the contract enforceable and a breach of it actionable. The defendant could not take advantage of the offer of the petitioner, as set forth in…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Venable v. BlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Weill v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Thomas v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  4. Farr v. Barnes Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  5. Hill Aircraft & Leasing Corp. v. Planes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API