Legal Opinion
Michigan Basic Property Insurance v. Office of Financial & Insurance Regulation
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 8, 2010No. Docket No. 293766PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFort Hood, J.
Respondents appeal by leave granted the circuit court’s order concluding that the insurance commissioner exceeded his authority by disapproving petitioner’s requested rate increase. We reverse.
Petitioner, the Michigan Basic Property Association, is a legislative creation. MCL 500.2920. It provides property insurance to qualified persons who have been unable to obtain insurance in the regular market. MCL 500.2901 et seq. Respondent Commissioner of the Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation (insurance com*554missioner) must approve petitioner’s plan of operation and any changes to that plan.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Marquis v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Judges of the 74th Judicial District v. Bay CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Travelers Insurance v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Book-Gilbert v. GreenleafMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Menard Inc. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re Casey EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Bloomfield Township v. KaneMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Wilcoxon v. City of Detroit Election CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.