Emerson v. Patridge
Supreme Court of Vermont
Negotiable paper, by what law governed, and how far subject to the operation of the trustee process. Trustee Process. The trustee, who resided in Burlington, Yt., disclosed that previous to the 1st day of April, 1853, he had dealings with the principal defendant who then resided and had ever since resided in Boston, Mass.; that on said 1st of April, 1853, ho forwarded from Burlington to the principal defendant a statement of their accounts with his note for the balance due,…
Read the full summary
Negotiable paper, by what law governed, and how far subject to the operation of the trustee process. Trustee Process. The trustee, who resided in Burlington, Yt., disclosed that previous to the 1st day of April, 1853, he had dealings with the principal defendant who then resided and had ever since resided in Boston, Mass.; that on said 1st of April, 1853, ho forwarded from Burlington to the principal defendant a statement of their accounts with his note for the balance due, being $536.50, dated at Burlington, and made payable, at the Commercial Bank in Burlington, to the principal defendant…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Isham, J.
The trustee acknowledges the execution of the note mentioned in his disclosure, and his indebtedness upon it, in the sum of three hundred dollars. The plaintiff claims the amount due thereon under this attachment. The claimants insist that the note belongs to them, as it was indorsed to them by the payee at Boston in Massachusetts, where they, as well as the payee and the *11principal defendant, reside. It appears from the case that the note was executed in this state; that it was payable here at the Commercial Bank in Burlington, and'that it was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hull v. BlakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
- M. Ward & Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
- Vanbuskirk v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
- Baylies v. James Houghton & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1843
- Chase, Grew & Co. v. James Haughton & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1844
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lewis v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Kiess v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Worden v. Nourse, Mason & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1864
- Wheeler v. WinnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1865