Legal Opinion

People v. Dial

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1915No. Crim. No. 417PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of misdemeanor committed on the seventh day of March, 1915, in that, according to the information, he did “sell, furnish, distribute and give away alcoholic liquors to another,” etc., within the third supervisorial district of San Bernardino County, that being “no license” territory, established as such by election pursuant to the Local Option Law. (Stats. 1911, p. 599.) We may perhaps assume that he appeals from the judgment, as that is the claim made in his counsel’s brief, although the notice of appeal is defective.

In addition to the testimony of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Matter of Application of LieritzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Chipman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  5. People v. SantagataAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ArnoldMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People v. CencevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. People v. MoralesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. State v. ElgesNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Sturgeon v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API