Hina v. Indus. Comm., 07ap-23 (9-6-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
{¶ 1} Relator, David E. Hina, filed this action in mandamus seeking a writ to compel the Industrial Commission of Ohio ("commission") to vacate its order denying him an award for an alleged violation of a specific safety requirement ("VSSR") from Anchor Glass Container Corporation ("Anchor Glass"). Relator requests that the writ also compel the commission to grant him an award for VSSR.
{¶ 2} In accord with Loc.R. 12, the case was referred to a magistrate to conduct appropriate proceedings. The parties stipulated to pertinent evidence and filed briefs. The magistrate then issued a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Lewis v. Diamond Foundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Hina v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Phlipot v. Doug Smith FarmsOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State ex rel. Hina v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008