New London Ship & Engine Co. v. Simpson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBbaley, J.
This is an action of contract to recover the price of certain parts furnished and expenses incurred by the plaintiff in the installation of an engine in the schooner Aspinet. The judge, by whom the case was heard without a jury on an auditor’s report in favor of the plaintiff and the evidence of the defendant, found for the plaintiff, and the *78case is here on the defendant’s exceptions to his refusal to give the following requests.
“On all the evidence the plaintiff is not entitled to recover.” “The delivery of parts for the engine at the yard of Bertelsen and Petersen Company where the Aspinet…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ginn v. AlmyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Welch v. GoodwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Davis v. CressMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Goodenough v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Kemensky v. ChapinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
3Cited by7 opinions
- Watkins v. Simplex Time Recorder Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- W. W. Britton Inc. v. S. M. Hill Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Riley v. BondiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Powers v. MacrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Williams v. VanariaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.