Legal Opinion

In the Interest of K.M.S.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2002No. 01-0753PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Per curiam

In this suit to establish paternity, David Gernenz seeks to set aside a prior order adjudicating Christopher Smith to be the father of K.M.S. Gernenz asserted that Smith’s failure to notify him of the prior paternity proceedings denied him due process, but the trial court refused to set aside the order. Reversing the trial court’s judgment, the court of appeals concluded that Smith’s failure to give notice and serve citation on Gernenz in the earlier paternity suit violated Gernenz’s constitutional right to due process. 68 S.W.3d 61, 67-71.

In its opinion, the court of appeals “decline[d] to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lofton v. Texas Brine Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services v. SherryTexas Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Deutsch v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. In Re SchmitzTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. AIR ROUTING INTERNATIONAL CORP.(CANADA) v. Britannia Airways, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  4. Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local No. 1338Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Houston Independent School District v. 1615 Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API