Maiden Creek Associates, L.P. v. United States Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BARRY, Circuit Judge.
This action for declaratory and injunc-tive relief is brought pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321. Maiden Creek Associates and the Board of Supervisors of Maidencreek Township appeal the order of the District Court dismissing their complaint and denying their motion to amend. We will affirm the judgment of the District Court.
I. BACKGROUND
Maiden Creek Associates (“MCA”), a limited partnership, owns 85 acres of land in Maidencreek Township that it hopes to develop into a 600,000 square-foot shopping center. The Board of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Estermann v. BoseNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Jefferies v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Davaun Barnett v. Penn Hills School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Estermann v. BoseNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Steven Trainer v. Robert AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.