Legal Opinion

In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 146 Cornelius

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 1993No. 414A92PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before the Court upon the recommendation of the Judicial Standards Commission that respondent, C. Preston Cornelius, a Judge of the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, Twenty-Second Judicial District, be censured as provided in N.C.G.S. § 7A-376. The record filed with us in support of the recommendation of the Judicial Standards Commission (Commission) that Judge Cornelius (respondent) be censured reveals the following:

On 19 October 1990, Judge Cornelius was advised pursuant to Rule 7 of the Judicial Standards Proceedings that the Judicial Standards Commission…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  5. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 76, KivettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 170, BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Lori Jayne KimblerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API