Legal Opinion

Pancoast v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 6, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issue presented is whether the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) abused his discretion in ordering William Pancoast (Claimant) to submit to an independent medical examination at the request of the City of Philadelphia (Employer). Because he did not, the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed the order of the WCJ, is affirmed.

The relevant facts are as follows. On May 9, 1986, in a prior proceeding, a WCJ granted total disability benefits to Claimant on the grounds that “Claimant became totally disabled by reason of a lung disease,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Caggiano v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Maranc v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. McGonigal v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Fairmount Foundry v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Linton v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Central Dauphin School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Coleman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API