Legal Opinion
Linton v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 28, 2006PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge FRIEDMAN.
Paul Linton (Claimant) petitions for review of the August 29, 2005, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), which affirmed the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) granting the Petition for Expert Interview of Employee (Petition) filed by Amcast Industries Corporation (Employer). We affirm.
Claimant has been receiving temporary total disability benefits for an April 27, 1998, work injury. Claimant participated in a vocational interview on March 15, 2001. Based on that interview, Employer filed a modification petition, which was denied by WCJ…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jacobs v. HalloranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Flynn-Scarcella v. Pocono Mountain School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Blairsville Transport Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Pancoast v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
3Cited by7 opinions
- Peters Township School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Anthony)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Gregory v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Linton v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Davis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.