United States v. Kertess
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. The first indictment related to the so-called Barth transaction, the facts concerning which are as follows:
October 22, 1940, Leukon cabled defendant from Switzerland, asking for quotations on fifteen ounces of rhodium, fifteen ounces of iridium and one hundred fifty ounces of palladium (all being “platinum group metals”) ; deliveries were to be made to one Barth. On the same day, defendant replied that he had informed Barth in Cali, Colombia. On October 29, 1940, he further replied, quoting the price and asking that payment be made to the Irving Trust Company, New…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. FalconeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Warszower v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Forte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Walter Augustus Bowe, Robert Steele Collier, and Khaleel Sultarn SayyedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- United States v. LebronCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Wood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.