Hornback v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
This is a takings action. Plaintiff alleges that his intellectual property was taken by the government’s imposition of a secrecy order on his patent application.1 Defendant asserts that plaintiffs claim is time-barred and barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. Before the court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to RCFC 56(b) for Res Judicata, or in the Alternative, to Dismiss Pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(4). For reasons of judicial economy and efficiency, the court considers both motions. For the following…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Barney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Hornback v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Hornback v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Hornback v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.