People v. Gilliard
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rizzi
A jury found defendant, Steven Gilliard, guilty of robbery. Defendant, who is black, contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial because the prosecutor systematically used peremptory challenges during the voir dire examination of the prospective jurors to exclude blacks from the jury solely because they were blacks. It is defendant’s position that he was denied the. type of fair trial guaranteed under the sixth amendment of the United States Constitution because the State affirmatively frustrated his right to a jury drawn from a fair cross section of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Mahaffey v. RamosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- People v. WithersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- People v. FrazierAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.