Legal Opinion
Smock v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Mich.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 19, 2018No. Case No. 18-10407PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Arthur J. Tarnow, Senior United States District Judge
Plaintiff, Professor Pamela Smock, brings this § 1983 Complaint against the Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, Andrew Martin (Dean of the College of Literature, Science and Arts), Martin Philbert (Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs) and Mark Schlissel (President). Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants violated her First and Fourteenth Amendment rights when they sanctioned her for alleged misconduct in April of 2017. She pleads that the University of Michigan's proceedings against her under its Standard…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frost v. Univ. of LouisvilleDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Carlock v. Wayne State UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Flor v. University of New Mexico Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Hasanaj v. Detroit Public Schools Community DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Lipian v. University of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.