Legal Opinion

Frost v. Univ. of Louisville

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided May 29, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-227-CRSPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles R. Simpson Iii, Senior Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff Dr. Christopher Frost's Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Permanent Injunction. DN 21. Defendants have responded (DN 22), and Plaintiff has replied (DN 24). This matter is now ripe for adjudication. For the reasons that follow, Frost's motion for preliminary injunction *796and permanent injunction will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART .

II. BACKGROUND

This litigation arises out of the termination of Plaintiff Dr. Christopher Frost from his tenure-track appointment as an Assistant Professor of Biology at the University of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carlock v. Wayne State UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  2. Flor v. University of New Mexico Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
  3. Heavin v. Kentucky State UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
  4. Kaplan v. University of LouisvilleDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
  5. Kenneth J. Woodside v. The Board of Regents of The University of Michigan, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API