Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Gist
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 11, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 20369PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, District Judge.
This action arises from the collision of an automobile driven by George Gist, the defendant, and a Yellow Cab. The plaintiffs, Robert and Wallace Sullivan, husband and wife, were passengers in defendant’s car and are suing to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly received by the wife. ■ Jurisdiction is based on diversity.
The defendant has impleaded Yellow Cab Co. as third-party defendant, alleging that if plaintiff was injured as alleged, such injury was caused in whole or in part by the negligence of Paul Rector, the driver of the cab at the time of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Helmig v. Rockwell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Sheppard v. Atlantic States Gas Co. of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Barbara E. Kimmel, Administratrix of the Estate of Frank C. Kimmel, Deceased v. Yankee Lines, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Kimmel v. Yankee Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
- Yellow Cab Co. Of D. C., Inc. v. JansonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
3Cited by3 opinions
- Radmacher v. CardinalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Chikotas v. American Buslines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Panto v. Safeway Trails, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966