Legal Opinion

Witt v. Akron Express, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 2004No. 04CA6PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kline, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Akron Express, Inc. and Scott W. Snyder appeal from the decision of the Gallia County Court of Common Pleas granting Billy R. Witt, his wife Theresa L. Witt, and their children, Billy Jr., Brandon, Jenifer, and Jeremy Witt, a new trial pursuant to Civ.R. 63(B). Because the successor trial judge independently reviewed the record and was satisfied that he was unable to determine whether a new trial would be appropriate under the relevant provisions of Civ.R. 59, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a new trial pursuant to Civ.R.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Berk v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In re Jane Doe 1Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Booth v. BoothOhio Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Myers v. Wild Wilderness Raceway, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Baldwin v. BaldwinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API