Legal Opinion
Austin Co. v. Smith Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided August 16, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Trover, etc. Before Judge Pendleton. Fulton superior court. March 17, 1911.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The T. L. Smith Company, a non-resident corporation, filed a trover suit against the W. E. Austin Company, for the recovery of two machines known as “Smith concrete mixers,” and of the alleged value of $1,805. Demand for the machines and refusal to deliver were alleged. The plaintiff elected to take a money verdict. The defendant denied the plaintiff’s right to recover the machines, and set up a cross-action against the plaintiff, on an account alleged to be due by the Contractors Supply and Equipment Company, the predecessor in title of the T. L. Smith Company, for commissions claimed to be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Culberson v. Alabama Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Hawkins v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. JacowaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
3Cited by6 opinions
- Drovers' & Mechanics' Nat. Bank of Baltimore v. First Nat. Bank of SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919
- Davis v. HemmingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Kemos, Inc. And Rohm and Haas Company v. I. Walton BaderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Ezzard v. State Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Mobley v. Hagedorn Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.