Brian Parker v. Larry Small
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM Opinion; Concurrence by Judge THOMAS.
OPINION
2Per curiam
The right of an accused to have his case heard before a jury of his peers is a hallmark of our criminal justice system. The jury’s verdict is of paramount importance in concluding the accused’s case. Accordingly, the Supreme Court has permitted trial judges to give extra instructions to deadlocked juries in the hope of encouraging, but not coercing, a jury verdict. See Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492, 17 S.Ct. 154, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896); Lowenfield v. Phelps, 484 U.S. 231, 108 S.Ct. 546, 98 L.Ed.2d 568 (1988); Early v. Packer, 537 U.S.…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Early v. PackerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Benjamin Flournoy, Jr. v. Larry SmallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Jesus Alvarez-UlloaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Daniel Gonzales v. Michael StainerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Dion Wilmont v. Scott KernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- (HC) Hill v. ArnoldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.