Crumley v. City of Atlanta

The defendant in his brief in effect concedes that case No. 19566, charging operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, was authorized. As to case No. 19567, he states in his petition for certiorari that it was not appealed because the court suspended the sentence in that case. As we construe the record, the testimony of Mrs. Sams above quoted refers to case No. 19569, and the testimony of Oleo Clark refers to No. 19568. If this interpretation be correct, the defendant was guilty of disorderly conduct in the first case, No. 19569, at 1030 Aliene Avenue, and,…