Munk v. Goldome National Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Plaintiff, Peter Munk (“Munk”), has filed this action to recover $6,500,000 for breach of contract, conversion, and duress. Defendant, Goldome Capital Investment, Inc. (“GCI”), is represented in this action by the firm of Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendel-sohn (“Proskauer”). Munk seeks, pursuant to this court’s supervisory power and DR 5-102(A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility, an order disqualifying Pros-kauer from representing GCI in this action. For the reasons set forth below, Munk’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
In order to purchase…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- International Electronics Corp. v. FlanzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,328 J. P. Foley & Co., Inc. v. Oliver D. Vanderbilt, Arthur Young & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- General Mill Supply Company, Manual Rotenberg and Milton Rotenberg, Plaintiffs v. Sca Services, Inc., Hale and DorrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- MacArthur v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Paretti v. Cavalier Label Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Fulfree v. ManchesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Ardemasov v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Barrie v. JacobsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990