State v. Weeks
Oregon Supreme Court
Jackson County. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtWaldo, J.
On the trial of two defendants for larceny, a verdict which reads,. “ We, the jury empanneled to try the above case, find the defendant guilty as charged in the indictment,” is void for uncertainty. Such a verdict cannot be amended on the affidavits of the jurors showing that they intended to convict both defendants: Richards v. Sperry, 7 Wis. 219. Judgment reversed and new trial ordered: Corn v. Call, 21 Pick. 514; Stuart’s Case, 28 Gratt. 967; Hogan v. State, 30 Wis. 428.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hogan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Stuart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
- Richards v. SperryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
- In re Booth for a Writ of Habeas CorpusNevada Supreme Court · 1916