Legal Opinion

State v. Weeks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Jackson County. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWaldo, J.

On the trial of two defendants for larceny, a verdict which reads,. “ We, the jury empanneled to try the above case, find the defendant guilty as charged in the indictment,” is void for uncertainty. Such a verdict cannot be amended on the affidavits of the jurors showing that they intended to convict both defendants: Richards v. Sperry, 7 Wis. 219. Judgment reversed and new trial ordered: Corn v. Call, 21 Pick. 514; Stuart’s Case, 28 Gratt. 967; Hogan v. State, 30 Wis. 428.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hogan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Stuart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
  3. Richards v. SperryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. In re Booth for a Writ of Habeas CorpusNevada Supreme Court · 1916