Legal Opinion
Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. v. Cotrone
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 2, 2004No. AC 23545PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant, Jerry Cotrone, from the judgment of the trial court granting the application filed by the plaintiffs, Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. (Salomon), and its financial advisor-employee, Mijanou M. Spurdle, to compel arbitration of the defendant’s claim against the plaintiffs. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On appeal, the defendant has asserted several claims that fairly can be summarized as follows: (1) the purported agreement between him and Salomon was unsigned and, therefore, does not comply with the prerequisites of General Statutes §…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated v. Helen Echo HayduCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Batter Building Materials Co. v. KirschnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Bennett v. MeaderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- A. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc. v. Town of LisbonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Success Centers, Inc. v. Huntington Learning Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. BoataConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Patushi v. Global Lending Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024