Legal Opinion
In the Interest of Riedel
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 1984No. Civ. 10776PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEDERSON, Justice.
This is an expedited appeal (and an expedited opinion) pursuant to commitment procedures (Chapter 25-03.1, NDCC), from a continuing treatment order requiring that Riedel be continued in hospitalization and treatment for mental illness for an indefinite period or until further order of the court. The matter is remanded for preparation of findings. Jurisdiction is not retained as authorized by Rule 35(b), NDRAppP.
Riedel, having been twice before committed, was committed for hospitalization and treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital on a 90-day order from the Williams…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hust v. HustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Blore v. John Z.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- DeForest v. DeForestNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Ellendale Farmers Union Cooperative Ass'n v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Zundel v. ZundelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kottke v. U.A.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- M.K. v. J.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Pryatel v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Johnson v. BronsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.