Legal Opinion

Grace Line, Inc., and National Bulk Carriers, Inc., Intervening v. Panama Canal Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 8, 1957No. 24226_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Chief Judge.

This appeal concerns the power of a federal district court to compel the government corporation which operates the Panama Canal to set tolls according to the new formula established by Congress in 1950 and to repay canal users several million dollars damages for excess tolls charged. It raises interesting and important questions as to judicial responsibility and authority when administrative action is dilatory or lacking.

A class action by canal users seeking this relief ended in summary judgment for the defendant below, when Judge Walsh concluded that he lacked jurisdiction…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Panama Canal Co. v. Grace Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. M. P. & St. L. Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1958
  3. Wolkstein v. Port of New York AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
  4. Panama Canal Co. v. Grace Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API