Legal Opinion

Larry Stewart v. Tony Trierweiler

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 14, 2017No. 16-2149PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

In this habeas case, Larry Stewart claims that a Confrontation Clause violation and prosecutorial misconduct undermined the fairness of his murder trial. But because the state court did not unreasonably reject these claims, we must reject his petition. We reverse the district court’s contrary decision.

I

On the morning of December 19, 2011, Kevin Brown arrived at an apartment to pick up Reynatta Hamilton for what he thought was a date. Unbeknownst to Brown, Hamilton’s boyfriend, Larry Stewart, was waiting for him. A struggle ensued. Shots were fired. The two men…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Julie Helphenstine v. Lewis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  2. Linda Stermer v. Millicent WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. Terrence Williams v. Sherry BurtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Sharon HallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  5. Ervine Davenport v. Duncan MacLarenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API