Legal Opinion

Martin v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 26, 2013No. AC 33682PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Andre Martin, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the court improperly determined that his trial counsel rendered effective assistance with regard to his exercising his right to testify at trial on his own behalf. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The record reveals the following relevant facts and procedural history. The petitioner was convicted of the crimes of attempt to possess one kilogram or more of marijuana with the intent to…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Joseph v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Brunetti v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Noze v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. Chance v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API