Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Hunter v. Lippold
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 7, 2004No. WD 63151PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge.
Members of the County Commission of DeKalb County, who are responsible for preparing the county budget, appeal a writ of mandamus that ordered them to perform their statutory duty to appropriate $10,000 for the operation of the University of Missouri Outreach and Extension Center. The commission had chosen to appropriate $2,500 for the Extension Center. The circuit court determined that section 262.597, RSMo 2000, required the commission to allocate at least $10,000 for the Extension Center. We affirm.
Standard of Review
We review mandamus as we do any other non-jury…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kearney Special Road District v. County of ClaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Bennett v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Kerperien v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- State Ex Inf. North Todd Gentry v. LamarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Missouri ex rel. Mo. Clean Energy Dist. v. McEvoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Great Rivers Habitat Alliance v. City of St. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Moore v. City of ParkvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Shaw v. Administrative Hearing CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- State Ex Rel. Goodman v. ST. LOUIS BD. OF POLICE COMM'NMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.