Legal Opinion

Sandberg v. Burns

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1936No. 30,926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Defendant May Burns, as the owner of certain real estate involved in and affected by the judgment entered in a mechanic’s lien action, appeals. There was no motion for new trial.

She assigns four errors: (1) That the evidence is insufficient to sustain the findings of fact; (2) that the conclusions of law are not justified by the findings; (3) that the court erred in not finding that the labor done and materials furnished by the lien claimants were in the nature of repairs made by or at the instance of the lessee and as such not lienable under 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, §…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Johnson v. StarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Wienholz v. HennessySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schaeffer v. NewberrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Willcox Boiler Co. v. MessierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  3. Knoff Woodwork Co. v. ZotalisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API