Legal Opinion

Willcox Boiler Co. v. Messier

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 28, 1941No. 32,969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Plaintiff claims a lien (denied below) under the statute (Mason St. 1927, § 8490) for the value of a boiler furnished by it to defendant Messier as contractor for the defendants McCullough and promptly installed in their greenhouse as auxiliary heat generator. Notwithstanding admission by answer that Messier “installed” the boiler “and base upon said premises,” the lien was denied for supposed failure of proof. That was error.

Decision below was that “it is not shown how the boiler ivas installed. It is not shown that it was set in concrete, screwed to the floor, fastened to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Eberle v. DrennanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Pike Bros. Lumber Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Cameron v. Oakland County Gas & Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Howes v. Reliance Wire-Works Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allentown Plaza Associates v. Suburban Propane Gas Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Abex Corporation v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Young Electric Sign Co. v. Erwin Electric Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Grote v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  5. Abex Corporation v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API