Madera v. Hall
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FINAL ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
JAMES LAWRENCE KING, Chief Judge.
This cause came before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss and motion for representation pro hac vice. Because this action is time-barred and because the court lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendant, the court grants the defendant’s motion to dismiss.
I. FACTS
The plaintiff claims that the defendant, Daryl Hall, made an allegedly libelous statement in a telephone interview with Music Connection, a magazine published in California. The defendant, a resident of New York, is an internationally…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- John Madara v. Daryl HallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Green v. USF & G CORP.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
- Smith v. Cuban American National FoundationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Wysnoski v. MilletDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Alternate Energy Corp. v. RedstoneDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.