Legal Opinion

Wysnoski v. Millet

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 11, 1991No. 90 C 5914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ALESIA, District Judge.

Before the Court is the motion of defendants’, Barron P. Millet (“Millet”), Tom Jones, d/b/a Tom Jones Aircraft Sales (“Jones”), Hassel V. “Scotty” Boggs (“S. Boggs”) and Rodney Boggs (“R. Boggs”), d/b/a the Boggs Company, to dismiss the complaint of the plaintiff, Dennis Wysnoski (“Wysnoski”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), or to transfer the case to the Northern District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1404(a), or to dismiss the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b).

I. FACTS

Wysnoski is an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vandeveld v. ChristophDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  2. Classic Auto Sales, Inc. v. SchocketSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. SimsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  4. Real Colors, Inc. v. PatelDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  5. Black & Decker Corp. v. Vermont American Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API