Lowery v. Rosengrant
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
This appeal is from a decree sustaining appellee’s demurrer to appellant’s amended cross-bill. Both the parties to this appeal were made defendants in the original cause. May v. Lowery et al. This court’s consideration of the original bill is shown in Lowery v. May, 213 Ala. 66, 104 So. 5, and May v. Lowery, 214 Ala. 230, 107 So. 67. That bill-named as defendants both parties to this appeal, as we have said, but there was no averment that Rosengrant had cut or removed timber, nor was specific relief prayed against him. The bill, so far as concerning Rosengrant, appears to have proceeded upon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lowery v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Andrews v. Hobson's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Davis v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Tribble v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- May v. LowerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Riley v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Maya Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Propst v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Smith v. ColpackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.