Legal Opinion

Channing v. Seneca-Cayuga Nation

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 2024No. 4:23-cv-00458Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SARAH SUE CHANNING, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 23-cv-00458-SH ) SENECA-CAYUGA NATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is the Tribal Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ petition for writ of habeas corpus.1 Plaintiffs filed their petition under the Indian Civil Rights Act, asserting that the Tribal Defendants’ actions amount to an illegal detention. Tribal Defendants, however, argue that (1) this Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction due to their sovereign immunity; (2)…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Gene S. Jacobsen, and Cross-Appellee v. Deseret Book Company, a Utah Corporation Dean Hughes, AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API