Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Sparks

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 20, 2006No. AP-75,083PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · WomackWomack, J.

The issue is whether post-conviction ha-beas corpus is available when a felony conviction was rendered on a guilty plea when in fact the offense was a misdemean- or. We hold that it is.

The State indicted Sparks for the offense of driving while intoxicated. Such an offense is a Class B misdemeanor 1 unless it is shown that the offender has a previous conviction for a similar offense. A showing of one previous conviction enhances the offense to a Class A misdemeanor; 2 two previous convictions enhance the offense to a felony of the third degree. 3

At the time of Sparks’s offense on May 3,…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TuleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Getts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Ex Parte ArnoldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ex parte FournierCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. Palmberg, Bryan ElliottCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. State v. WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  4. Ex Parte Jessep, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  5. Saucedo, Andrew MelchorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2019

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API