Saucedo, Andrew Melchor
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Saucedo pleaded guilty to possession of methamphetamine, but post-plea laboratory testing has shown that the substance he possessed was actually methylethcathinone. Saucedo argues that, in light of this new evidence, his guilty plea was involuntary. Under the Court's holdings in Ex parte Palmberg and Ex parte Broussard , I cannot agree that Saucedo's plea was involuntary. However, I do think that his conviction violates due process on other grounds. I write separately to explain my rationale.
I. FACTS
Saucedo was initially charged with two felony offenses: first-degree felony possession of a…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cape, John GabrielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2021
- Carpenter, Thomas Allen IIICourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2024
- Ex Parte Dakota Douglas Dixon, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2022
- Garcia, Louie Roland AKA Garcia, LouieCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2021
- Hicks, Ray AnthonyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2022
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.