Legal Opinion

People v. Thompson

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1989No. F009754PublishedCited by 14 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

Statement of the Case

An amended information charged appellant Robert Daniel Thompson with the following felonies: count I, kidnapping (Pen. Code, § 207, subd. (a)); count II, assault with intent to commit rape (Pen. Code, § 220); and count III, assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)). Appellant was also charged with the following enhancements for all three counts: using a deadly weapon during the commission of said offenses (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (b)), and previously having been convicted of rape, a serious felony (Pen. Code, § 667, subd. (a)).

Appella…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. PenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. People v. NorrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. AskeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. PittsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API