Legal Opinion
Re v. Magness Construction Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided September 30, 1955No. 416, Civil Action, 1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, J.:
The authorities are uniform in holding that where a Deed is executed and delivered pursuant to a Contract of Sale of realty, the latter merges with the former and becomes void. This rule is clearly expressed in Dieckman v. Walser, 114 N. J. Eq. 382, 168 A. 582, 583, as follows:
“It is the general rule that the acceptance of a deed for land is to be deemed prima facie full execution of an executory agreement to convey, and thenceforth the agreement becomes void, and the rights of the parties are to be determined by the
deed, not by the agreement. Until consummated, an executory…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dieckman v. WalserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Stevens v. MilestoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Raab Et Ux. v. BeattySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Allen v. Currier Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by7 opinions
- CALDWELL ET UX v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Pryor v. AviolaSuperior Court of Delaware · 1973
- Allied Builders, Inc. v. HeffronSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Carey v. Shellburne, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
- Reed v. HassellSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.