Legal Opinion
Tatum v. Iowa
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 6, 1987No. 87-1293PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Per curiam
Elmo C. Tatum appeals pro se and in forma pauperis from the district court’s1 dismissal without prejudice of his civil rights action. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Tatum filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981-82 (1982). After the district court’s order that the case would be dismissed unless the original complaint was amended, Tatum filed an amended complaint. He alleged that the defendants had violated his civil rights by not giving him the same care as given white senior citizens, even though legislation provided funds for the equal welfare of both black and white senior citizens.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Roy Stewart, Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Paul MacIasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Rhodes v. HoustonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1962
- Charles Horsey v. David AsherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Zane Brent Edgington v. Missouri Department of Corrections Mel Carnahan Robert Schoenen Donna Schriro Cranston Mitchell Julie IvesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Ellis v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Mildfelt v. Circuit Court of Jackson County, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Mildfelt v. Circuit CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Johnson v. DOLLAR GENERALDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.